This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments »

1. 1
   Si Says:
   

   Yes, Rod, you got it. This WAS better than Shakespeare In Love, but SiL was more easily accessible – hence why it won the Oscar.

   September 8th, 2007 at 12:33 pm
2. 2
   selena Says:
   

   at least Shakespeare in love bothered to make up some story. this thing was just a collection of loosely related images. which i guess makes it ‘artistic’ or whatever.

   August 16th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
3. 3
   Anthony Says:
   

   Selena,

   There generally isn’t a whole lot of need to “make up some story” in an Historical film…

   August 24th, 2008 at 4:05 am
4. 4
   Mik Vance Says:
   

   LMAO!!!!!

   March 1st, 2009 at 9:15 am
5. 5
   Danby Says:
   

   And yet they did anyway . . .

   November 24th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
6. 6
   Dreadjaws Says:
   

   Freaking awesome!

   December 9th, 2009 at 11:51 am
7. 7
   Luna Says:
   

   "Our marital troubles are solved, at the mere price of hundreds of lives!"

   Priceless.

   You, sir, are awesome.

   December 11th, 2009 at 1:41 am
8. 8
   Brad Says:
   

   Hey the marriage analogy lasted longer than that! They drove a minivan till the end! With DOUBLE sliding doors!!!!

   January 21st, 2010 at 8:53 pm
9. 9
   MovieBuff Says:
   

   Isn’t it odd? Rod gives this movie a horrible “no one will EVER watch this film” review, nd then hands it 4.5 stars?

   April 20th, 2010 at 7:26 am
10. 10
    ash Says:
    

    4 1/2 stars? really? for this vapid little film? while gladiator and american psycho got 3 1/2? um- okay.

    June 10th, 2010 at 7:27 am
11. 11
    jeromycraig Says:
    

    Rod didn't give it a horrible review. Rod pointed out that it's an excellent movie that nobody saw, because people tend to go for crap like "Shakespeare In Love" and "Titanic".

    July 15th, 2010 at 6:49 pm

Leave a reply