Comments on: King Arthur http://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html Abridged Scripts for Movies Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:45:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jenny Edwardshttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-112497 Jenny Edwards Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:48:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-112497 I know from somewhere Your from Star Wars ( Dies) It made me laugh, watching the DVD at minute hahaha. I know from somewhere
Your from Star Wars ( Dies)
It made me laugh, watching the DVD at minute hahaha.

]]> By: MovieBuffhttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-57344 MovieBuff Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:45:08 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-57344 Hilarious! You did great on this one Rod. "For example, though I play Merlin, I don’t have any magical powers at all. I’m just covered in dirt. That’s about it for me." -Best line ever! "Try wearing a corset" LOL! Hilarious! You did great on this one Rod.

"For example, though I play Merlin, I don’t have any magical powers at all. I’m just covered in dirt. That’s about it for me." -Best line ever!

"Try wearing a corset" LOL!

]]> By: Smater than allhttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-29566 Smater than all Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:38:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-29566 @extremely long discussion of asinine details of two jokes that used to be funny:jibber jabber jibber jabber things I looked up on wikipedia five minutes ago and will now try to pass off as my own knowledge jibber jabber @extremely long discussion of asinine details of two jokes that used to be funny:

jibber jabber jibber jabber things I looked up on wikipedia five minutes ago and will now try to pass off as my own knowledge jibber jabber

]]> By: depechemodefanhttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-21236 depechemodefan Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:23:44 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-21236 Great line, "Try wearing a corset!" I can't wait for Keira to complain about something else. At least in public she hadn't complained about being confussed for Natalie Portman by her mom.I havn't seen the movie, but what the fig? King Arthur is Roman? Great line, "Try wearing a corset!" I can't wait for Keira to complain about something else. At least in public she hadn't complained about being confussed for Natalie Portman by her mom.

I havn't seen the movie, but what the fig? King Arthur is Roman?

]]> By: Jacie_Jawbreakerhttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-19347 Jacie_Jawbreaker Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:11:50 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-19347 It was depressing having all the magic sucked out of King Arthur...I mean, seriously. Childhood dreams CRUSHED, much?...Try wearing a corset! ((Seriously lol'd, no joke.)) It was depressing having all the magic sucked out of King Arthur...I mean, seriously. Childhood dreams CRUSHED, much?

...Try wearing a corset! ((Seriously lol'd, no joke.))

]]> By: smdhttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-16382 smd Sat, 17 May 2008 02:17:32 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-16382 For some reason I absolutely loved the line, "I’m just covered in dirt. That’s about it for me." For some reason I absolutely loved the line, "I’m just covered in dirt. That’s about it for me."

]]> By: AJhttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-13131 AJ Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:51:14 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-13131 Utter defiance Says:but strangely the Saxons measure the firing range of their crossbows with a handbow in the movie. — Also when the ice breaks it breaks forward (towards the bad guys) and as that is the direction in which Dagonet thrusts his axe I actually think that is the way the ice would break according to the laws of physics (not too sure though). since after it breaks forward it starts breaking in the reverse way too.Yeah, the way they measure the firing range makes no sense whatsoever. Nor does bunching up in a single group when under fire from half a dozen archers. They should have split up in multiple groups.The ice beraking that way can actually be explained (kind of). The ice would start to fracture toward the point where it is under the greatest pressure (where the largest number of people is standing on it). I got to admit though, that the reality isn't anywhere near as clean as this. For one thing, shattering ice is not that easy. If it is thick enough to hold a couple of hundred people, you'd be chipping for quite a while before you're through. Also, once it breaks, the crack doesn't necessarily continue like that. Most likely, Dagonet would have created a hole under his own feet (nice way to commit suicide!) and created a weak area, but the saxons would have to time to run for the shore. Utter defiance Says:

but strangely the Saxons measure the firing range of their crossbows with a handbow in the movie.
—
Also when the ice breaks it breaks forward (towards the bad guys) and as that is the direction in which Dagonet thrusts his axe I actually think that is the way the ice would break according to the laws of physics (not too sure though). since after it breaks forward it starts breaking in the reverse way too.

Yeah, the way they measure the firing range makes no sense whatsoever. Nor does bunching up in a single group when under fire from half a dozen archers. They should have split up in multiple groups.

The ice beraking that way can actually be explained (kind of). The ice would start to fracture toward the point where it is under the greatest pressure (where the largest number of people is standing on it). I got to admit though, that the reality isn't anywhere near as clean as this. For one thing, shattering ice is not that easy. If it is thick enough to hold a couple of hundred people, you'd be chipping for quite a while before you're through. Also, once it breaks, the crack doesn't necessarily continue like that. Most likely, Dagonet would have created a hole under his own feet (nice way to commit suicide!) and created a weak area, but the saxons would have to time to run for the shore.

]]> By: Utter defiancehttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-11899 Utter defiance Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:05:07 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-11899 @the bow discussion:but strangely the Saxons measure the firing range of their crossbows with a handbow in the movie. --- Also when the ice breaks it breaks forward (towards the bad guys) and as that is the direction in which Dagonet thrusts his axe I actually think that is the way the ice would break according to the laws of physics (not too sure though). since after it breaks forward it starts breaking in the reverse way too. @the bow discussion:

but strangely the Saxons measure the firing range of their crossbows with a handbow in the movie.
---
Also when the ice breaks it breaks forward (towards the bad guys) and as that is the direction in which Dagonet thrusts his axe I actually think that is the way the ice would break according to the laws of physics (not too sure though). since after it breaks forward it starts breaking in the reverse way too.

]]> By: AJhttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-10150 AJ Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:36:10 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-10150 Actually, the aiming higher thing has some basis in reality. The Saxons were supposedly using crossbows. (Really unlikely in that period, but whatever.) One of the problems with using a crossbow in battle used to be that it is almost impossible to fire them at an angle. The bow itself blocks your field of view, so you cannot aim and the bolt tends to wobble around, making accurate shooting impossible. Modern bows can be made to compensate (so a certain point) for those failing, but in the middle ages it was a very serious problem. Point is: handbows could be used with some accuracy over longer ranges than crossbows. Especially the bows used by Roman cavalry of the period, which were copied of the Persian design and extremely powerful. Of course some explanation would have been nice, since we can hardly expect the audience to know these things. Actually, the aiming higher thing has some basis in reality. The Saxons were supposedly using crossbows. (Really unlikely in that period, but whatever.) One of the problems with using a crossbow in battle used to be that it is almost impossible to fire them at an angle. The bow itself blocks your field of view, so you cannot aim and the bolt tends to wobble around, making accurate shooting impossible. Modern bows can be made to compensate (so a certain point) for those failing, but in the middle ages it was a very serious problem.
Point is: handbows could be used with some accuracy over longer ranges than crossbows. Especially the bows used by Roman cavalry of the period, which were copied of the Persian design and extremely powerful. Of course some explanation would have been nice, since we can hardly expect the audience to know these things.

]]> By: Jenipapohttp://www.the-editing-room.com/arhur.html#comment-9083 Jenipapo Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:10:52 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=30#comment-9083 ''Curses! He’s aiming higher! He’s unstoppable!'THANK YOU, I though the exact same thing. ''Curses! He’s aiming higher! He’s unstoppable!'

THANK YOU, I though the exact same thing.

]]>